Skip to main content

Pro/Con-a-Thon: Peer Scoring

Peer Scoring Rubric

Use the rubric below to score your competing teams on how well they discovered and evaluated sources for their topic. Remember: score fairly! Low-balling other teams will result in the librarian assigning appropriate scores. Each student will vote individually; votes can be submitted by Web at PollEv.com/dapfelba or by phone at the code on the screen.

Evaluation

A. 1 point: Team adequately addressed 1 of the 5 evaluation criteria set forth in the CRAAP model.

B. 2 points: Team adequately addressed 2 of the 5 evaluation criteria set forth in the CRAAP model.

C. 3 points: Team adequately addressed 3 of the 5 evaluation criteria set forth in the CRAAP model.

D. 4 points: Team adequately addressed 4 of the 5 evaluation criteria set forth in the CRAAP model.

E. 5 points: Team adequately addressed all of the 5 evaluation criteria set forth in the CRAAP model.

© 2016 New York Institute of Technology